“Government Should Not Support the People”
All of
which leads me to a few words about a president who happens to
be among my personal favorites: Grover Cleveland — our 22nd and
24th president (the only one to serve two nonconsecutive terms),
and the humble son of a Presbyterian minister.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
“I can
find no warrant for such an appropriation in the
Constitution; and I do not believe that the power and
duty of the General Government ought to be extended to
the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner
properly related to the public service or benefit.” —
Grover Cleveland, after vetoing a relief bill for Texas
farmers.
Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division
[LC-USZ62-13024 DLC] |
|
|
Cleveland
said what he meant and meant what he said. He did not lust for
political office, and he never felt he had to cut corners,
equivocate or connive in order to get elected. He was so
forthright and plain-spoken that he makes Harry Truman seem
indecisive by comparison.
This strong
streak of honesty led him to the right policy conclusion again
and again. H.L. Mencken, who was known for cutting politicians
down to size, even wrote a nice little essay on Cleveland
entitled "A Good Man in a Bad Trade."
Cleveland
thought it was an act of fundamental dishonesty for some to use
government for their own benefit at everyone else’s expense.
Accordingly, he took a firm stand against some early stirrings
of an American welfare state.
In "The
American Leadership Tradition: Moral Vision from Washington to
Clinton," Marvin Olasky noted that when Cleveland was mayor of
Buffalo, N.Y., in the early 1880s, his "willingness to resist
demands for government handouts made his name known throughout
New York State," catapulting him to the governorship in 1882 and
the presidency in 1884.
Indeed,
frequent warnings against using the government to redistribute
income were characteristic of Cleveland’s tenure. He regarded as
a "serious danger" the notion that government should dispense
favors and advantages to individuals or their businesses. This
conviction led him to veto a wagonload of bills — 414 in his
first term, and 170 in his second — far more than all the
previous 21 presidents combined. "I ought to have a monument
over me when I die," he once said, "not for anything I have ever
done, but for the foolishness I have put a stop to."
In vetoing
a bill in 1887 that would have appropriated $10,000 in aid for
Texas farmers struggling through a drought, Cleveland wrote:
"I can find
no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution; and I
do not believe that the power and duty of the General Government
ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which
is in no manner properly related to the public service or
benefit. A prevalent tendency to disregard the limited mission
of this power and duty should, I think, be steadily resisted, to
the end that the lesson should be constantly enforced that,
though the people support the Government, the Government should
not support the people."
Cleveland
went on to point out, "The friendliness and charity of our
fellow countrymen can always be relied on to relieve their
fellow citizens in misfortune." Americans proved him right.
Those Texas farmers eventually received in private aid more than
10 times what the vetoed bill would have provided.
As a
devoted Christian, Cleveland saw the notion of taking from some
to give to others as a violation of the Eighth and Tenth
Commandments, which warn against theft and envy. He noticed what
20th century welfare statists did not, namely, that there was a
period after the word "steal" in the Eighth, with no
added qualifications. It does not say, "Thou shalt not steal
unless the other guy has more than you do, or unless a
government representative does it for you, or unless you can’t
find anyone who will give it to you freely, or unless you’re
totally convinced you can spend it better than the guy to whom
it belongs."
Cleveland had been faithful to the Founders and to what he
believed were God’s commandments, common sense and historical
experience. I can’t say the same for certain of his successors
who, in more recent times, cast wisdom to the winds and set
America on a very different course.
. |